No universals in the cultural evolution of kinship terminology

Change in kinship terminologies will be universally predicted by mode of marriage.

Test
Test Name	Support	Significance	Coefficient	Tail
Bayesian phylogenetic models	Not supported	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`

Variables
Variable Name	Variable Type	OCM Term(s)
Mode Of Marriage	Independent	Mode Of Marriage, Kin Relationships
Kinship terminologies	Dependent	Kinship Terminology

Main Author	Published Year	Hypothesis	Supported	Variables Tested
Passmore, Sam	2020	Change in kinship terminologies will be universally predicted by residence patterns.	Not supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Passmore, Sam	2020	Change in kinship terminologies will be universally predicted by common ancestry.	Not supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Coult, Allan D.	1965	". . . Crow and Omaha terminology should be associated with matrilateral cross-cousin marriage, or, if these terminologies occur in the absence of such marriage, their presence is an indicator that such marriage was formerly practiced" (122)	Not Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Murdock, George Peter	1949	"When the normal mode of marriage is by the exchange of sisters, the same kinship terms tend to be applied to MoBrWi and FaSi, to WiBrWi and Si, and to WiBrDa and SiDa" (172)	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Passmore, Sam	2021	Kinship typologies can be created by modeling similarities between kinship terminologies across different languages.	Supported	1	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author