Hunting and gathering: the human sexual division of foraging labor

The level of contribution by either gender is positively associated with flexibility in foraging activities (174).

Test
Test Name	Support	Significance	Coefficient	Tail
Comparison of percentages	Supported	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`

Variables
Variable Name	Variable Type	OCM Term(s)
Contribution To Foraging Subsistence	Dependent	Collecting, Division Of Labor By Gender

Main Author	Published Year	Hypothesis	Supported	Variables Tested
Martin, M. Kay	1975	Subsistence activities performed by males provides a greater proportion of the hunter-gatherer diet than those performed by females (183).	No support claimed	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Frederic L. Pryor	2005	Social differentiation will be positively associated with other types of inequality among different types of foraging economies. (52)	Partially supported	9	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Frederic L. Pryor	2005	Foraging economy type (Classic, transitional, human-wealth oriented, intangible-wealth oriented, politically oriented, and physical-wealth oriented) will be associated with certain social structural characteristics (50).	Partially supported	13	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Frederic L. Pryor	2005	Agricultural economy type (Herding-Plus, Egalitarian, Individualistic, or Semi-Marketized) will be associated with the presence of certain political institutions. (116)	Partially supported	15	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Marlowe, Frank W.	2007	Sexual division of foraging labor will be positively associated with seasonality (174).	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author