The function of romantic love: a re-appraisal of the coppinger and rosenblatt study

Controlling for subsistence technology, there will be no significant association between romantic love and subsistence dependence (57).

Test
Test Name	Support	Significance	Coefficient	Tail
F test	Supported	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`

Variables
Variable Name	Variable Type	OCM Term(s)
Romantic Love	Dependent	Basis Of Marriage
Subsistence Dependence Of Spouses	Independent	Division Of Labor By Gender
Subsistence Type	Combined	Annual Cycle, Diet

Main Author	Published Year	Hypothesis	Supported	Variables Tested
Coppinger, Robert M.	1968	". . . that where subsistence dependence between spouses is strong, romantic love is unimportant as a basis of marriage; while where subsistence dependence between spouses is weak, romantic love is important as a basis of marriage" (310)	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Rosenblatt, Paul C.	1966	"For the two measures of dependence frustration, the correlations with importance of romantic love as a basis for marriage are virtually zero" (338)	Supported	3	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Jankowiak, William	1992	Romantic love is a human universal.	Supported	1	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Cozby, Paul C.	1971	"Greater privacy for newlyweds is associated with greater romantic love" (277)	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
de Munck, Victor C.	1999	Romantic love is positively associated with allowance of premarital sex (270).	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author