Economic systems of foragers
Cross-Cultural Research • Vol/Iss. 37 • Published In • Pages: 393-426 •
By Pryor, Frederic L.
Hypothesis
Forager economic type will not be associated with famine threat, percentage of hunting subsistence, presence of gambling, conflict, corporate descent groups, household form, family form, marital form, postmarital residence, female power, male aggression, and male dominance (408, 415, 416).
| Test Name | Support | Significance | Coefficient | Tail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster analysis | Supported | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN |
| Variable Name | Variable Type | OCM Term(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Conflict | Association | Ingroup Antagonisms, Instigation Of War |
| Corporate Descent Groups | Association | Rule Of Descent |
| Economic System | Association | Property System, Production And Supply, Exchange Transactions |
| Family Form | Association | Household |
| Famine | Association | Disasters |
| Female Power | Association | Gender Roles And Issues |
| Gambling | Association | Gambling |
| Household Form | Association | Household |
| Hunting | Association | Hunting And Trapping |
| Male Aggression | Association | Drives And Emotions, Gender Roles And Issues, Ingroup Antagonisms |
| Male Dominance | Association | Gender Status |
| Postmarital Residence | Association | Residence |