The differences between "tight" and "loose" societies

No hypotheses are tested in this paper.

Test
Test Name	Support	Significance	Coefficient	Tail
`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`

Variables
Variable Name	Variable Type	OCM Term(s)
Tight Vs. Loose Societies	Dependent	`NONE`

Main Author	Published Year	Hypothesis	Supported	Variables Tested
Hutter, Mark	1972	"A positive relationships exists between satisfaction potential for the five dimensions of child-training practices and tight-lose societies, and a negative relationship between socialization anxiety potential and tight-loose societies" (280).	Supported	3	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Gelfand, Michele J.	2011	Population density is positively correlated with tightness-looseness (p. 1101).	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Gelfand, Michele J.	2011	Food deprivation is positively correlated with tightness-looseness (p. 1101).	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Harrington, Jesse R.	2015	The relationship between tightness/looseness and happiness will exhibit a curvilinear relationship, such that very tight and very loose nations have worse outcomes relative to nations intermediate on tightness-looseness	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Harrington, Jesse R.	2014	Tight states will exhibit greater conscientiousness and lower openness compared to loose states (7993).	Supported	3	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author