Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study

Science Vol/Iss. 332 American Association for the Advancement of Science New York, Ny Published In Pages: 1100-1104
By Gelfand, Michele J., Raver, Jana L., Nishii, Lisa, Leslie, Lisa M., Lun, Janetta, Lim, Beng Chong, Duan, Lili, Almaliach, Assaf, Ang, Soon, Arnadottir, Jakobina, Aycan, Zeynep, Boehnke, Klaus, Boski, Pawel, Cabecinhas, Rosa, Chan, Darius, Chhokar, Jagdeep, D’Amato, Alessia, Ferrer, Montse, Fischlmayr, Iris C., Fischer, Ronald, Fülöp, Marta, Georgas, James, Kashima, Emiko S., Kashima, Yoshishima, Kim, Kibum, Lempereur, Alain, Marquez, Patricia, Othman, Rozhan, Overlaet, Bert, Panagiotopoulou, Penny, Peltzer, Karl, Perez-Florizno, Lorena R., Ponomarenko, Larisa, Realo, Anu, Schei, Vidar, Schmitt, Manfred, Smith, Peter B., Soomro, Nazar, Szabo, Erna, Taveesin, Nalinee, Toyama, Midori, Van de Vliert, Evert, Vohra, Naharika, Ward, Colleen, Yamaguchi, Susum

Hypothesis

Population density is positively correlated with tightness-looseness (p. 1101).

Note

Rural population density was significant at the .01 level.

Test

Test NameSupportSignificanceCoefficientTail
CorrelationSupportedp<.10.59Two-tailed

Variables

Variable NameVariable Type OCM Term(s)
Population DensityIndependentPopulation
Tightness-looseness In NormsDependentNorms, Social Control, Sanctions, Social Offenses