Valuing thinness or fatness in women: reevaluating the effect of resource scarcity

Evolution and Human Behavior • Vol/Iss. 26 • Published In 2005 • Pages: 257-270 •

By Ember, Carol R., Ember, Melvin, Korotayev, Andrey V., de Munck, Victor C.

Abstract

This study focuses on preferences for thinness or fatness in women cross-culturally. Results contradict previous studies and the hypothesis that preference for fatness in women is predicted by resource scarcity. Alternative explanations for valuation of fatness are explored, including climate and male dominance.

Samples
Sample Used	Coded Data	Comment
Probability Sample Files (PSF)
Standard Cross Cultural Sample (SCCS)

Hypotheses (4)
Hypothesis	Supported
"Societies with greater resource scarcity will have more positive valuations of fatness in women" (258).	Not Supported
In societies where there is little or no food storage, a high threat of disasters will be associated with low valuation of fatness in women (261).	Supported
Societies in colder climates are more likely to value fatness in women (262).	Not Supported
Societies where male dominance is valued will place a higher valuation on fatness in women (262).	Supported

Documents and Hypotheses Filed By: Kate Cummings Megan Farrer

Valuing thinness or fatness in women: reevaluating the effect of resource scarcity

Evolution and Human Behavior • Vol/Iss. 26 • Published In 2005 • Pages: 257-270 • Cite

By Ember, Carol R., Ember, Melvin, Korotayev, Andrey V., de Munck, Victor C.

Abstract

Samples

Hypotheses (4)

Evolution and Human Behavior • Vol/Iss. 26 • Published In 2005 • Pages: 257-270 •