Accordance and conflict between religious and scientific precautions against COVID-19 in 27 societies

Religion, Brain & Behavior Vol/Iss. 14 Routledge Published In Pages: 1-19
By Samore, Theodore, , Fessler, Daniel M.T., Sparks, Adam Maxwell, Holbrook, Colin, Aarøe, Lene, Baeza, Carmen Gloria, Barbato, María Teresa, Barclay, Pat,, Berniūnas, Renatas, , Contreras-Garduño, Jorge,, Costa-Neves, Bernardo, , del Pilar Grazioso, Maria, Elmas, Pinar, Fedor, Peter, , Fernandez, Ana Maria, , Fernández-Morales, Regina, Garcia-Marques, Leonel, Giraldo-Perez, Paulina, Gul, Pelin, Habacht, Fanny, Hasan, Youssef, , Hernandez. Earl John, Jarmakowski, Tomasz, , Kamble, Shanmukh, Kameda, Tatsuya, Kim, Bia, Kupfer, Tom R., Kurita, Maho, Li, Norman P., Lu, Junsong, Luberti, Francesca R., Maegli, María Andrée, Mejia, Marinés, Morvinski, Coby, Naito, Aoi, Ng'ang'a, Alice, de Oliveira, Angélica Nascimento, Posner, Daniel N., Prokop, Pavol, Shani, Yaniv, Solorzano, Walter Omar Paniagua, Stieger, Stefan, Suryani, Angela Oktavia, Tan, Lynn K.L., Tybur, Joshua M., Viciana, Hugo, Visine, Amandine, Wang, Jin, Wang, Xiao-Tian

Hypothesis

Correlation between the number of religious and public health precautions taken against COVID-19 will vary cross-culturally from negative to positive.

Test

Test NameSupportSignificanceCoefficientTail
Pearson correlationSupportedNA|r| = 0.2 to 0.6UNKNOWN