Marital residence among foragers

Foraging societies will be more likely than nonforagers to have bilateral descent (279).

Test
Test Name	Support	Significance	Coefficient	Tail
Mann-Whitney U-Test	Supported	p<.001	`UNKNOWN`	`UNKNOWN`

Variables
Variable Name	Variable Type	OCM Term(s)
Bilateral Descent	Dependent	Rules Of Descent
Foraging	Independent	Collecting, Hunting And Trapping

Main Author	Published Year	Hypothesis	Supported	Variables Tested
Chaney, Richard P.	1966	"No prediction can be made about the presence or absence of exclusive monogamy from the . . . information [bilateral descent-independent family-small household]" (1461)	Supported	4	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Rácz, Péter	2019	Bilateral or ambilineal descent systems are likely to have less complex kinship systems than patrilineal or matrilineal ones (11).	Supported	5	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Murdock, George Peter	1949	"Age-differentiating terms used by a brother for his sisters . . . are associated with bilateral descent" (110)	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Murdock, George Peter	1973	"Bilateral descent strongly predominates at the level of Low Complexity, . . . its incidence declines in the middle ranges, especially sharply at the Upper Middle level, but rises to nearly 50 per cent among the cultures of highest complexity" (391-392)	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author
Aberle, David F.	1961	[Descent is related] ". . . to stratification. . . . Matrilineal systems tend to have hereditary, rather than complex stratification to a greater degree than . . . patrilineal and bilateral systems" (698)	Supported	2	Cite Related Hypotheses More By Author