Revisiting status-envy: does the theory hold up?

Cross-Cultural Research • Vol/Iss. 23 • Published In • Pages: 146-181 •
By Broude, Gwen J.

Abstract

Author first tests the validity of the variables traditionallyused in tests of status envy theory. Then the author tests some of the implications of the theory and proposes somewhat different mechanisms.

Samples

Sample Used Coded Data Comment
Standard Cross Cultural Sample (SCCS)Other Researchers

Hypotheses (7)

HypothesisSupported
Four measures of primary feminine identification will be associated with female control of resources (158).Partially supported
Matrilocal/ambilocal residence will be positively associated with higher female status (162).Not Supported
"Where the mother (or women in general) serves as primary caretaker in infancy, but where female status is low in the larger social context, males will undergo circumcision ceremonies as a component of initiation rites" (164).Not Supported
"Where the mother (or women in general) serves as primary caretaker in infancy, and where female status is high in the larger social world, males will engage in couvade practices (164).Not Supported
"Where the mother (or women in general) serves as primary caretaker in infancy, males will display masculine protest behavior in adulthood, regardless of the status of women in the larger social context (164).Not Supported
The role of the father will be associated with circumcision, the couvade, and protest masculinity (170).Supported
The role of the father will be the most significant predictor of circumcision, the couvade, and protest masculinity (172).Supported
Documents and Hypotheses Filed By: Kate Cummings  Megan Farrer