Human–Pet Dynamics in Cross-Cultural Perspective

Anthrozoös • Vol/Iss. 24 • Taylor and Francis Ltd • • Published In • Pages: 17-30 •
By Gray, Peter B., Young, Sharon M.

Abstract

Using a sample of 60 societies from eHRAF, this study explores the cross-cultural commonalities and differences in human-pet dynamics. The authors focus on understanding the range of functions of pets and the positive or negative treatment of pets. In addition, they test whether human investment in pets is a significant challenge of evolutionary theory. First, the results support that there are distinct functions of pets, challenging the common view of contemporary function of pets as emotional surrogates. Secondly, the data collected show an ambivalent treatment of pets across cultures, including small-scale societies. Finally, the research does not support the idea that human investment in pets sacrifices their reproductive success.

Note

Dogs and cats often did not meet the criteria to qualify as “pets”, according to the definition given by the authors. However, the data was still included since both animals were usually present in the sample.

Samples

Sample Used Coded Data Comment
eHRAF World CulturesResearcher's ownThe sample includes hunter-gatherers, horticulturalists, pastoralists, and other kinds of subsistence types.

Hypotheses (3)

HypothesisSupported
The function of pets will be cross-culturally different from the view of pets as playthings and emotional surrogates for children.Supported
Positive treatment of pets will be present across cultures.Not supported
Human investment in pets will sacrifice their reproductive success on behalf of pets.Not supported
Documents and Hypotheses Filed By: Jessie Cohen  Megan Farrer  stefania.becerralavado