Hypotheses
- Stronger preferences for friendships for support and socializing are likely to be associated with stronger preferences for close and enduring friendships.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 2 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - Stronger preferences for friendships in self-serving goals would likely be associated with stronger preferences for casual and convenience friendships.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 2 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - Collectivist/low relational-mobility societies are likely to value closeness in friendships.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 2 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - Collectivist/low relational-mobility societies are likely to value endurance in friendships.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 2 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - A participant’s age and sex will likely affect their friendship preferences with closeness & endurance.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 3 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - Preferences for closeness and endurance in friendship would be generally consistent across cultures.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 2 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - People would likely to prefer having combination of close and casual friendships, leaning towards the former.
Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 1 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - People would prefer to have a combination of enduring and convenient friendships, leaning towards the former.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 1 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - The higher a participant scores on the Machiavellianism scale, the stronger their preference would be for casual and convenience friendships.Apostolou, Menelaos - Preferences for Closeness and Endurance in Friendship: A Cross-Cultural Inve..., 2025 - 3 Variables
This article asks about the types of friendships people prefer across cultures, focusing on closeness and endurance. The authors hypothesize that people generally favor close and enduring friendships, especially when seeking support and social input, while those with self-serving or mate-seeking goals may prefer casual and convenient ones. Using data from 6,224 participants across 12 countries, they find that most people prefer close and enduring friendships, and that preferences largely align with actual friendships. Results also show small but significant effects of Dark Triad traits—particularly Machiavellianism—on friendship preferences. The conclusion is that friendship preferences are broadly consistent across cultures but shaped by individual goals and personality.
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author - ". . . inalienable friendship will be found in the maximally solidary community; clse friendship in scharacteristic of the solidary-fissile . . . casual friendship appears on nonnucleated society . . . and expedient friendship is found in the individuated social structure" (354)Cohen, Yehudi A. - Patterns of friendship, 1961 - 2 Variables
The author postulates that there are different types of friendship that characterize different societies--"inalienable friendship," "close friendship," "casual friendship," and "expedient friendship." These types are postulated to be characteristic of different types of community systems (described on pages 314-318 of this volume).
Related Hypotheses Cite More By Author